Armenia FM: Unilateral concessions are ruled out

Armenia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Zohrab Mnatsakanyan doesn’t agree with the view that ‘in essence, Armenia doesn’t really need to solve the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, the lands are taken, and the status-quo is favorable’.
“I can’t agree with this. Both Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh are interested in the establishment of sustainable peace in the region, and sustainable peace can be established through a peaceful agreement based on mutual concessions. Unilateral concessions are ruled out since they can’t be prospective. Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh can’t be interested in a situation where there are no sustainable and long-term foundations for peace and security in the region. In this sense, for us, the process of peaceful negotiations has been and remains a key priority for the settlement of this conflict,” the foreign minister told Interfax, News.am reports.
Assessing the role of the OSCE Minsk Group, the foreign minister stated that since the mid-1990s, the format of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs, including Russia, the US and France, has been and remains the only format of negotiations, and there are concrete results. It is a format recognized by the international community and includes the three permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. These are three countries that have a rather major political and diplomatic resource for mediation. These countries continue to be very involved in the process. “A mechanism, criteria and approaches have been developed throughout the years, and they ensure the scope in which it is possible to develop an option for tangible and real mutual concessions. In this sense, we continue and we will only continue to support this format of mediation. The Russian Federation is one of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs. The Russian side’s efforts were very effective, and they were seen during the events in July of this year and before the events. I am certain that Russia’s involvement at all levels emphasizes Russia’s serious attitude towards this process and the major contribution that Russia, along with the other Co-Chairs, is making to the peaceful settlement. There is no question here, and any attempt to question the work of the Co-Chairs which, by the way, is a major way of preventing escalation and pressure on the existing format, is unacceptable,” Mnatsakanyan said.
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


