Duma Elections Reinforce Kremlin Dominance Amid the War

    United Russia wins 57.83% of the vote and retains its constitutional majority in the State Duma. For the first time since the full-scale war against Ukraine began, parliamentary elections were held amid limited political competition and without an OSCE election observation mission.

     

    The United Russia party, which supports President Vladimir Putin, has retained control of the State Duma following the parliamentary elections held on September 18–20. According to preliminary data from the Central Election Commission (CEC), after more than 95% of the ballots had been counted, the party received 57.83% of the vote in the federal electoral district and, according to the CEC, holds 355 of the 450 seats in the State Duma.

    The result gives United Russia a constitutional majority and allows the Kremlin to maintain virtually unchanged control over the lower house of parliament. In the previous parliamentary elections in 2021, the party received 49.8% of the vote, representing a significant increase in its official result in the current election.

    The current vote was the first parliamentary election in Russia since the start of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. During the campaign, the Kremlin presented the election as an indicator of public support for the Russian leadership’s policies and the ongoing war. According to CCBS, the political system remained under tight control throughout the campaign, while most openly anti-war candidates were prevented from participating in the elections.

    The degree of political competition was one of the key issues surrounding the election. The main parliamentary parties allowed to participate did not pose a systemic challenge to the presidential authorities, while the participation of independent and anti-war politicians was significantly restricted. Restrictions also affected the Yabloko party and its representatives, who had criticized the war.


    Additional questions about the transparency of the process arose after the Russian authorities decided not to invite OSCE/ODIHR observers. The organization stated that Moscow’s refusal to facilitate international observation was inconsistent with Russia’s commitments as an OSCE participating State and deprived the electoral process of an independent assessment. The OSCE also said that the Russian authorities had failed to provide substantive responses to its attempts to establish pre-election dialogue and prepare an observation mission.

    On election day, Russian authorities also reported cyberattacks targeting remote electronic voting systems and communications networks. Moscow said the attacks had been repelled, although the Russian authorities’ claims of Ukrainian involvement were not accompanied by publicly released evidence.

    Another international dispute was triggered by the holding of Russian elections in Ukrainian territories that Moscow has declared part of Russia. Ukraine and a number of Western countries do not recognize Russia’s jurisdiction over these territories. As a result, the State Duma election has implications not only for Russia’s domestic political system but also for the international legal and political dispute surrounding the occupied Ukrainian territories.

     

    The election result gives the Kremlin an opportunity to portray the preservation of its parliamentary majority as evidence of continued public support for its political course. However, the official results primarily reflect voting conducted within Russia’s existing political system, where opportunities for opposition participation, independent campaigning and external observation were significantly restricted. The electoral result alone therefore cannot provide an unequivocal measure of public support for all aspects of the Russian leadership’s policies, including the war against Ukraine.


    #RUSSIA
    #NEWS

    21.09.2026 08:57





Latest news

    Bulgaria Asks NATO to Strengthen Its Defences Amid Black Sea Threats: Sofia Fears Growing Risks to Maritime Shipping

    16.Oct.2026

    Black Sea Shipping Risks Threaten Bulgaria’s 5 Million Tonnes of Wheat Exports

    15.Oct.2026

    Georgia’s Foreign Funding and Political Ban Laws Draw Criticism from the Venice Commission

    15.Oct.2026

    Kazakhstan Promotes a Caspian Green Energy Corridor: Astana Seeks New Routes to the European Market

    14.Oct.2026

    Inflation in Romania Accelerates to 6.61%: Rising Prices Increase Pressure on Households and the Economy

    13.Oct.2026

    Can Europe Protect the International Criminal Court from Trump’s Sanctions?

    13.Oct.2026

    Georgia’s Constitutional Court Continues Case on Banning Opposition Parties: Political Pluralism at Stake

    12.Oct.2026

    Azerbaijan and Iran Step Up Security Contacts Amid Hijab Protests

    12.Oct.2026

    Personnel Shortages Complicate Ukrainian Forces’ Rotation: Ukraine Faces Long-Term Challenges on the Front Line

    11.Oct.2026

    Trump Eases Sanctions on Russian Fuel After Talks with Putin: Kyiv Fears Boost to Moscow’s War Revenues

    10.Oct.2026

    Putin Seeks to Strengthen Russia’s Influence in the Post-Soviet Space Through the CIS

    10.Oct.2026

    Russia and the South Caucasus: External Pressure, Political Competition and a Crisis of Trust

    10.Oct.2026

    Peaceful Settlement Between Armenia and Azerbaijan: Moving from Declarations to Implementation

    10.Oct.2026

    Moldova Ready to Accept as Many Ukrainians as Necessary if Situation Worsens This Winter

    09.Oct.2026

    Turkmenistan Turns Avaza into a Regional Diplomatic Hub as Caspian, Central Asian and CIS Agendas Converge

    08.Oct.2026

All news