U.S. Intelligence Assessment: The Kremlin Is Not Ready for Compromise on Ukraine

U.S. intelligence agencies believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s objectives in the war against Ukraine remain unchanged, despite ongoing diplomatic contacts and statements about a possible peaceful settlement. According to Reuters, citing several sources familiar with U.S. intelligence assessments, the Kremlin continues to aim for maximum control over Ukraine and shows no signs of abandoning these intentions. These conclusions were set out in analytical reports prepared at the end of September and, according to the sources, have not changed since then.
According to U.S. and European intelligence assessments, Putin’s views on the conflict are strategic and long-term in nature and do not depend directly on the current dynamics of the fighting or on economic pressure from the West. Intelligence officials believe that Moscow views the war not only as a confrontation with Ukraine, but also as part of a broader effort to restore Russia’s influence in the region and to reshape Europe’s security architecture. Sources also note that Russia may be using negotiations primarily as a tool to buy time and strengthen its positions, rather than as a genuine attempt to reach a compromise.
Russia currently controls about 20% of Ukraine’s territory, including Crimea and significant parts of the Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson regions. At the same time, the U.S. administration has publicly stated that diplomatic efforts are making progress and that a possible peace plan is being discussed, including security guarantees for Ukraine. However, the territorial issue remains the main obstacle to an agreement, as Kyiv rejects any proposals that would imply recognition of the loss of its territories.
U.S. intelligence officials emphasize that there are currently no signs that Moscow is ready to make meaningful concessions that could lead to a swift end to the war. In this context, analysts warn that the conflict is likely to remain prolonged, even if the negotiation process continues at the political level.
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


