Half of Azerbaijanis’ Income Goes to Food: Hidden Causes and Possible Consequences for the Economy

The latest data from the State Statistics Committee, showing
that more than half of Azerbaijanis’ expenses go toward food, effectively
confirms the deterioration of the country’s consumer situation. Despite the
growth of nominal incomes, real purchasing power continues to decline, and the
food market is increasingly displaying signs of systemic problems that are
already directly affecting the population’s quality of life.
According to the report, out of 58.6 billion manats in
retail sales recorded since the beginning of the year, more than 31.9 billion
were spent on food, beverages, and tobacco products. In other words, a
significant portion of household budgets is used merely to cover basic needs – a
situation more typical of developed countries during crisis periods than of an
economy that Azerbaijan seeks to present as dynamic and growing.
The rise in food expenditures is a direct result of the fact
that food inflation has outpaced overall inflation for several consecutive
years. While global prices fluctuate, the local market reacts too sharply: even
minor instability is immediately reflected on store shelves. The problem is
compounded by Azerbaijan’s partial dependence on imports of key items – grain,
oils, and processed foods. This creates a paradox: despite significant
investments in the agricultural sector, the country remains hostage to global
market conditions.
The internal structure of the market looks no less alarming.
Segments responsible for food logistics and distribution remain highly
concentrated, which creates a weak competitive environment in which prices rise
quickly but decrease slowly – or do not decrease at all. As a result, consumers
constantly find themselves in a situation where they must tolerate higher costs
without being able to compensate for them through income growth.
At the household level, the consequences are even more
noticeable: families are left with fewer resources for healthcare, education,
household goods, and other important categories. People are effectively forced
to cut back on expenditures that have a direct impact on their quality of life.
Moreover, the population’s ability to save is shrinking, which in the long term
reduces the economy’s resilience to shocks and crises.
A cultural factor that has long been considered a strength –
attention to high-quality products and food traditions – under current
conditions has turned into an additional financial burden. People continue to
buy familiar products even as their prices rise, simply because changing
consumption habits is difficult. As a result, spending on everyday purchases
remains critically high.
Economists have repeatedly warned: when half of a
household’s budget is spent on food, this is a clear signal of a mismatch
between incomes and the real cost of living. Under such conditions, it is
difficult to speak of consumer market growth and, consequently, of meaningful
support for economic dynamics. The current structure of spending shows that
related industries are slowing down, and domestic demand remains weak and
uneven.
The outlook for 2026 remains uncertain. Even under the most
optimistic scenarios, a rapid decrease in the share of food expenditures is
unlikely – too many factors are putting pressure on consumers. The baseline
scenario, which experts see as the most realistic, essentially predicts the
continuation of the current burden. Any external price shocks – rising costs of
grain, fuel, or logistics – could further worsen the situation and increase
pressure on household budgets.
Thus, the statistics published by the State Committee represent a troubling signal that the economy is applying the brakes precisely where it should be accelerating. Rising food expenditures are becoming a barrier that limits development, reduces living standards, and makes the population increasingly vulnerable. Without structural reforms in the food sector and real income growth, the situation risks deteriorating even further.
Latest newsThe Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026
The South Caucasus in the Context of Expanding External Involvement
02.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


