State Duma Denounces Plutonium Disposal Agreement with the United States

The
State Duma of the Russian Federation has officially adopted a law denouncing
the agreement with the United States on the disposal of weapons-grade
plutonium. The document was supported by the majority of deputies from all
parliamentary factions, with only a few abstentions.
The agreement, signed in 2000, envisaged the disposal of 34
tons of surplus weapons-grade plutonium by each side. The goal of the treaty
was to reduce the stockpiles of fissile materials suitable for producing
nuclear weapons and to strengthen mutual trust between Moscow and Washington.
According to State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin, the
decision to withdraw from the agreement was prompted by “the aggressive policy
of the United States and its loss of capacity for equal dialogue on strategic
stability issues”. He stressed that “Russia can no longer consider itself bound
by an agreement violated by the other party”.
The explanatory note to the bill states that Washington
allegedly failed to fulfill its obligations regarding the technological process
for plutonium reprocessing and in fact suspended the practical implementation
of the agreement.
Analysts note that the decision to denounce the treaty fits
into the Kremlin’s broader course toward dismantling the remaining elements of
the bilateral arms control system established after the Cold War. Earlier,
Russia had suspended participation in the New START Treaty and agreements on
nuclear site inspections.
According to experts, the withdrawal from the plutonium
agreement is more a
political than a technical step, symbolizing a final rupture
between Moscow and Washington in the field of nuclear security.
Some Russian lawmakers have stated that Russia can now independently manage its accumulated plutonium, including using it for scientific purposes and in next-generation nuclear energy projects. However, Western observers express concern that this move could increase the risk of a renewed nuclear arms race.
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


