Armenia Revises Security Concept: Pashinyan Criticizes CSTO

Prime Minister of Armenia
Nikol Pashinyan stated that the country’s traditional concept of external security
has effectively “failed”. According to him, the Collective Security Treaty
Organization (CSTO), of which Armenia has been a member since its creation,
failed three times to fulfill its allied obligations to the republic.
Pashinyan
stressed that the crisis of trust in the CSTO has become systemic, and the very
model of ensuring security through external allied structures can no longer be
considered reliable.
“Armenia has found itself in a situation where its expectations from allied formats have not been met. This requires a revision of the entire architecture of national security”, – the prime minister noted.
The
statement came against the backdrop of ongoing negotiations on normalizing
relations with Azerbaijan and internal debates about reorienting foreign
policy. The Armenian leadership increasingly speaks of the need to build a more
independent defense system and seek new international partnerships.
Pashinyan’s
words confirm Armenia’s growing distance from the CSTO and Russia, which has
traditionally been considered the main guarantor of the republic’s security.
For Moscow, this is a blow to its image: an ally in the South Caucasus openly
declares the failure of a system created under its leadership.
In
recent years, Yerevan has been developing ties with the EU, the US, France, and
Iran, seeking to establish alternative mechanisms of protection. Domestically,
this is a step toward forming a “multi-vector” strategy in which Russia ceases
to be an unconditional partner.
However,
a sharp departure from the CSTO may lead to increased pressure from Moscow,
including economic and energy-related measures. At the same time, building up
Armenia’s independent military potential and searching for new allies will
require significant financial resources.
Pashinyan’s
statement could also accelerate peace talks with Azerbaijan: in the context of
the “failure of the old system”, Armenia is interested in reducing the risks of
conflict. Turkey and Azerbaijan, on the other hand, are likely to use Yerevan’s
weakened ties with Moscow as an opportunity to strengthen their influence.
Thus, Pashinyan’s statement is not just criticism of the CSTO, but a signal of a paradigm shift in Armenian security. Armenia effectively acknowledges that the previous model of “relying on allies” has not worked and is ready to look for new formats, even at the cost of escalating tensions with Moscow.
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


