Protest at Russian Base in Armenia

On August 23, 2025, a protest took place at the gates of Russia’s 102nd military base in Gyumri, organized by the opposition party “For the Republic”. Participants demanded the withdrawal of the base from Armenian territory, expressing their discontent in sharp forms.
According to the organizers, the protest was symbolic: its aim was to remind the public that the presence of Russian troops in Armenia is increasingly perceived as a restriction of the country’s sovereignty. The demonstration began early in the morning, which, according to political analysts, was intended to catch the military and local residents off guard and ensure maximum resonance in the media.
It should be noted that the 102nd base in Gyumri is the largest Russian military facility in the South Caucasus. Its presence in Armenia is regulated by bilateral agreements, with the term extended until 2044. Formally, the base serves as a guarantor of Armenia’s security, especially in the context of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. However, following the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war and the subsequent deterioration of relations with Moscow, voices have increasingly been heard claiming that Russia “failed to fulfill its allied obligations” and did not defend Armenia’s interests.
Thus, the “For the Republic” protest reflects growing discontent within parts of Armenian society toward Russia’s military and political presence. Whereas earlier criticism of Russia came mainly from the diaspora and certain NGOs, today the slogan “Russia is not a guarantor of security” is becoming part of the political mainstream. This may signal the beginning of a gradual reorientation of Armenia toward the West and regional partners (EU, USA, Iran), especially after the Washington declaration with Azerbaijan.
However, such demonstrations may also exacerbate internal divisions. A significant part of Armenian society still regards Russia’s presence as an important deterrent. Escalation between “pro-Russian” and “anti-Russian” forces in the country could lead to deeper political polarization and new street clashes.
For external players – the US, EU, and Turkey – the protest served as an indicator that the window for diplomatic and economic expansion into Armenia is widening. Moscow, on the other hand, may view the demonstration as a “hostile act” and increase pressure on the Armenian authorities.
The protest at the 102nd base is not an isolated incident but rather a symptom of profound changes in Armenian politics and society. Armenia is gradually moving away from seeing Russia as the sole guarantor of its security. The question is whether the authorities will be able to maintain a balance between the “traditional ally” and new partners without triggering severe domestic destabilization.
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


