The Kremlin Centralizes Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Space: Kiriyenko Receives New Powers

Major changes have occurred in the Kremlin’s governance structure, potentially reshaping Russia’s strategy toward former Soviet republics. Sergey Kiriyenko, First Deputy Chief of Staff of the Presidential Administration of Russia, has been granted expanded authority to coordinate foreign policy actions in the post-Soviet space. His responsibilities now include Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Armenia.
According to analysts, this move signals a shift to a rigid, centralized model of governance in regions previously considered Russia’s “grey zones of influence”. While Moscow used to act through informal channels and loyal politicians, it is now moving toward direct and public intervention in the affairs of neighboring states.
Moscow political analyst Ilya Gusev notes that Kiriyenko is known as an effective administrator and the chief architect of domestic stability. His move into foreign policy indicates that the Kremlin no longer wishes to rely on ad hoc decisions or “friends of Moscow” in the region. Instead, a strict vertical power structure is being implemented.
The selection of countries under his supervision is particularly telling – all are flashpoints of geopolitical tension where Russia’s influence is either waning (as in Armenia) or challenged by other powers (as in Transnistria and Abkhazia).
This step can be interpreted as an attempt by the Kremlin to preserve what remains of its control over its traditional sphere of influence, amid military pressure in Ukraine, cooling ties with Central Asia, and increased activity from the EU, Turkey, and China.
For example, Armenia is seriously discussing a withdrawal from the CSTO and aligning with the West, Moldova is intensifying its pro-European path and negotiating the demilitarization of Transnistria, and Georgia refuses direct political subordination to Moscow despite its internal crisis.
Essentially, Kiriyenko is being handed the last bastions of influence where "institutional control" is still possible, rather than relying solely on military or economic leverage.
According to the European Policy Centre (EPC), Kiriyenko’s appointment may also signal preparations for a more aggressive foreign policy in the region – potentially up to attempts to impose a “union model” of political governance or establish proxy regimes fully dependent on Moscow.
“This is not just a personnel reshuffle, it’s a restructuring of the imperial core of foreign policy”, said EPC expert Thomas Ranz.
The decision to hand control over these problematic post-Soviet regions to Kiriyenko is not a cosmetic move – it marks a new phase in the geopolitical game. Russia is betting on bureaucratic efficiency and centralized control in response to mounting Western pressure and internal crises in former Soviet republics.
Expert Group CCBS
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


