Ceasefire Between Iran and Israel: End of War or Calm Before the Storm?

After
nearly two weeks of intense fighting between the Islamic Republic of Iran and
the State of Israel, the two sides have agreed to a ceasefire. The announcement
was officially made on June 23 by U.S. President Donald Trump.
"Congratulations to the whole world, the time for peace has come!" — proclaimed the American leader.
The 12-day conflict marked the culmination of escalating
tensions between Iran and Israel, including strikes on Iranian nuclear
infrastructure, mass rocket and drone attacks, assaults on U.S. bases in the
region, and civilian casualties on both sides.
Israel accused Iran of supplying weapons to militants in
Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza, as well as pursuing the development of nuclear
weapons. Iran, in turn, stated that its military actions were a response to
Israeli provocations and interference in regional affairs.
Trump called the agreement a "huge diplomatic
victory" and "the beginning of a new era in the Middle East."
However, despite the announcement of a ceasefire, new
attacks were reported just hours after the declarations of peace:
- In Be'er Sheva, at least four people were killed in a
rocket strike;
- Israel
launched strikes on targets in central Iran;
- Both
sides accused each other of violating the agreement.
President
Trump admitted in a furious post:
"Iran violated the ceasefire. But so did Israel. I'm not happy about it."
The ceasefire was met with cautious optimism:
- Qatar played a key mediating role;
- Russia
called for adherence to the agreement and stated its "clear stance against
war";
- The
EU, China, and Turkey expressed support for peace but voiced concerns over the
lack of verification mechanisms.
Many
analysts believe that the agreement, announced hastily and without formal
signatures, remains extremely fragile.
The parties have not announced the creation of monitoring
mechanisms, have not clarified the status of Iran’s nuclear program, nor
addressed the fate of attacks on U.S. bases.
Without clear steps toward de-escalation, a renewed
outbreak of violence is only a matter of time. The risk of spontaneous attacks
and provocations remains high. The involvement of international observers
(possibly from the UN or OSCE), the resumption of nuclear negotiations, and a
strengthened role for Qatar and China as mediators are all possible next steps.
Thus, the ceasefire between Iran and Israel is not the end of the conflict — but merely a pause. As long as rockets remain in the skies and public statements are filled with mutual accusations, true stability in the Middle East remains elusive. Still, even a temporary ceasefire is an opportunity. The only question is whether it will be seized in time.
Latest newsThe Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026
The South Caucasus in the Context of Expanding External Involvement
02.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


