Iran Rejects Ceasefire: “We Will Talk Only After Our Response”

Amid
intense Israeli airstrikes on Iranian targets, Tehran has officially informed
mediators — Qatar and Oman — of its firm stance: no negotiations for a ceasefire
will take place while Israel continues its attacks on the Islamic Republic’s
territory.
This was reported by Reuters, citing sources close to Iran’s top leadership.
According to Tehran, any talks about peace are only possible after the completion of a “full
military response”, which is intended to serve as a “warning to any future
aggressors.”
Since the beginning of the week, Israel has carried out a
series of massive strikes on strategic and scientific facilities across Iran —
including industrial zones in Isfahan, radar bases in Bushehr, and even
infrastructure near Tehran. These strikes were in retaliation for drone and
missile attacks launched at Israeli cities on June 13.
Iran's response has been no less aggressive: dozens of
rockets and drones were launched toward Israeli territory. Unconfirmed reports
suggest that the strikes hit oil terminals and military installations.
A source close to Iran’s National Security Council told
Reuters:
“We will not allow our response to become a bargaining chip. A ceasefire will only be possible once Israel feels the consequences of its actions.”
This statement reflects Tehran’s strategic objective: not
just to retaliate, but to create an environment in which future attacks by Israel would be
politically and militarily unfavorable.
Global leaders, including those from the EU and G7, have
expressed deep concern over rising tensions in the region. An emergency
statement calling for de-escalation is reportedly being prepared in Brussels,
though it lacks concrete leverage over the warring sides.
Washington, for its part, is maintaining a neutral stance,
limiting itself to expressions of “deep concern” and diplomatic outreach. The
U.S. has so far declined direct involvement, despite requests from Israel.
Thus, the conflict has entered a stage of open
confrontation, where diplomacy has temporarily taken a back seat. Iran is
positioning itself not as a party seeking peace, but as one dictating the terms.
Qatar and Oman are losing their status as effective mediators unless they can
bring the parties back to the negotiating table.
If Iran truly carries out its promised “response,” the coming week could prove decisive — either tensions will begin to subside, or the escalation will spiral out of control. The reactions of Washington and Beijing will play a critical role — will they be willing to intervene, even diplomatically?
Source: www.reuters.com
Latest news“Muslim NATO”: Turkey’s New Strategic Vector
10.Jan.2026
The Use of the “Oreshnik” Missile and a New Phase of Escalation Around Ukraine
09.Jan.2026
Solidarity Deferred: Croatia and Romania’s Dangerous Retreat
08.Jan.2026
Azerbaijan’s Eurasian Initiative: Ambitions, Challenges, and Doubts
07.Jan.2026
The Great Rotation: Personnel Reshuffles in Ukraine’s Leadership
06.Jan.2026
The United States Did Not Confirm an Alleged Ukrainian Attack on Putin’s Residence
05.Jan.2026
The Trans-Caspian Fiber Optic Cable: A Digital Milestone Connecting Europe and Asia
04.Jan.2026
Georgia Hopes for a Review of Venezuela’s Recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia Amid Ongoing Crisis
04.Jan.2026
Ukraine’s Allies Discuss Security and the Future of a Peace Settlement
03.Jan.2026
Iran Amid a Growing Domestic Crisis: Causes, Dynamics, and External Factors
03.Jan.2026

14 Jan 2026


