Azerbaijani president on Karabakh conflict: I have negative assessment of current state of negotiations

I have a negative assessment of the current state of negotiations and I think the Azerbaijani people fully agree with me, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said in an interview to Azerbaijan Television, Ictimai Television, and Real Television following a groundbreaking ceremony of the offshore operations of the Absheron field at the Heydar Aliyev Baku Deep Water Jackets Plant, Trend reports.
“As you know, I have always told the truth to the people of Azerbaijan. I think this is the only right policy. The people must know what is happening, where we are, and what our policy is. In my speeches and meetings with the media, I clarify topical issues, and I think this is very important. Citizens must know this, and they need to get the right information to do the right analysis. Negotiations are virtually non-existent. I have said that we will not participate in negotiations for the sake of their imitation. This does not mean that we are refusing to negotiate. It means that we do not want to join Armenia's cunning policy. Our participation in imitation of negotiations would correspond to the essence of this imitation. In fact, the Armenian leader has disrupted the process of negotiations. He is not disrupting it but has already disrupted it. Because their nonsensical statements and provocative steps make the talks meaningless,” the head of state said.
Azerbaijani president said that unfortunately, the current leadership of Armenia does not realize this responsibility.
“They also fail to properly analyze the consequences of their actions. However, there are rationally thinking people and politicians in Armenia, and these politicians are already raising this issue and telling the Armenian public that the incumbent Armenian leadership is leading Armenia into the abyss. As you know, two years ago, when a coup took place in Armenia, Azerbaijan remained neutral. In other words, we did not attempt to take advantage of the situation. We thought it was inevitable because the previous Armenian government only aroused hatred among the Armenian people. This military-criminal regime had brought Armenia to an appalling state, especially since the new government began to make very encouraging statements that they wanted to resolve this issue. They criticized the previous government and sent us positive signals through unofficial channels, asking us for some time. We also lived with the hope that the new government would innovate all areas, including this area, and would correct the previously wrong policy. This idea became even stronger after my meetings with the prime minister of Armenia in Dushanbe. At that time, I was asked to give them some time, because the domestic situation in Armenia was difficult, representatives of the previous government wanted to take revenge and this would have a very negative impact on the negotiations. They claimed to be inclined to negotiate and wanted to resolve the issue. The request was made to strengthen the ceasefire. My word was that we must hold serious talks and, of course, the ceasefire would be even stronger,” the Azerbaijani president said.
President Ilham Aliyev said that After that meeting, both sides made separate statements on the basis of agreement.
“The main essence of the statements was that we met, held an informal and unofficial meeting, agreed to speed up the negotiations, and strengthen the ceasefire. Because these two positions must always correspond to each other. Otherwise, it would mean a strengthening of the status quo, and we can never agree to that. For some time, the co-chairs of the Minsk Group also lived with hopes and occasionally, during meetings, put forward theories that were full of hope. However, the nonsensical thoughts voiced by the Armenian prime minister last year dealt a serious blow to the negotiations. By saying ‘Karabakh is Armenia’, he not only spread lie all over the world and this continues to this day, but also made the negotiations meaningless. If he thinks that Karabakh is Armenia, then what can we talk about? If he thinks that Karabakh is Armenia although the whole world rejected this nonsense – then what kind of peace agreement can we talk about? In other words, it was a political provocation,” the head of state said.
Latest news
Latest newsRomania Faces Political Deadlock: Nicusor Dan Moves to Form a New Government
01.Sep.2026
Pashinyan Meets Aliyev in Bishkek: Armenia and Azerbaijan Prepare for a New Stage in the Peace Process
01.Sep.2026
Ukraine Plans to Present Allies with a New War Strategy and Seek Early EU Funding
31.Aug.2026
The Mecca Pact — Protection or a Trap for Turkiye?
30.Aug.2026
Tigran Khzmalyan: Armenia must make a Decisive Choice in Favor of Europe
30.Aug.2026
Bulgaria to Strengthen Its Black Sea Fleet: Sofia to Receive Seven Minehunter Vessels
29.Aug.2026
Russia Intensifies Strikes on Ukraine’s Infrastructure, Targeting Warehouses and Logistics Hubs
28.Aug.2026
A New Economic Framework for Central Asia and the Caucasus: The Role of Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan
28.Aug.2026
Moscow Warns London: Russia Considers Strikes on British Military Targets
27.Aug.2026
Kazakhstan Launches a New Economic Strategy: GDP Growth, Investment and Pension Reform
27.Aug.2026
CIA Director Visits Moscow: Trump Hopes for Results
26.Aug.2026
Former Ukrainian Defense Minister Warns of Risk of Gradual Defeat in War with Russia
25.Aug.2026
Putin Authorizes Temporary State Management of Critical Infrastructure Vulnerable to Drone Attacks
24.Aug.2026
The United States Rapidly Expands Missile Production: Pentagon Accelerates Output of Tomahawks and Other Critical Weapons
24.Aug.2026
Record Supplies: Armenia Boosts Fish Exports to Georgia
23.Aug.2026

01 Sep 2026


